![]() ![]() Institutional and administrative mechanisms pursuing PCD are put in place.Policy Statements are issued by a country, embracing the PCD principle.In practical terms, it takes three shapes: ![]() Against these trends, PCD is a principle for coherence whereby all policies should not only achieve their own purposes but also fulfil the criterion of not undermining the interests of developing countries. For example, agricultural policy can undermine rural development by flooding emerging markets with cheap subsidised products and trade can undermine access to medicine in places where they are most needed, because treaty clauses on intellectual property rights favour drug developers over users, keeping prices high. It calls for attention to the negative externalities of those policies which are not directly concerned with development. ![]() What is PCD? PCD was born in the 1990s, from a reflection on the need for coherence between policies with an impact on developing countries. Here is a brief overview of why you should still hear about both PCD and PCSD for a while. Yet it is not just the “sustainable” version of PCD. Granted, PCSD emerged with the 2030 Agenda which substitutes Sustainable Development Goals to the Millennium Development Goals. Despite their very similar acronyms, Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) and Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development (PCSD) are not the same thing. For most practitioners, they stand as a vague reminder in favour of coherence between different policies, along with other injunctions such as “mainstreaming” gender, human rights or global health. If you work in development, in environment or anywhere near the United Nation’s 2030 Agenda, you probably came across the acronyms PCD and/or PCSD at some point. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |